Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Carta Marina.jpeg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Carta Marina.jpeg, featured
[edit]Info created by w:Olaus Magnus - uploaded by Fred J - nominated by Grillo 03:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Support extremely detailed old map in high resolution. /Grillo 03:06, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Support --Beyond silence 08:40, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
--MichaelMaggs 09:28, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Support
Oppose I see that what I thought were folds are actually stitching errors. --MichaelMaggs 15:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Support --Thermos 15:40, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Oppose Bad stitching, noise; small text not legible, not even in full res. -- MJJR 21:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Comment The colors change, sometimes dramatically, between the stitches. Calibas 23:19, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Support -- Walké 07:47, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Support - I don't see any stitching errors, this is a mount of 3x3 printed sheets. BTW, also a FP in the en:wiki -- Alvesgaspar 09:53, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
QuestionAny rationale for those color changes between some stitches? Otherwise great map in superb resolution. --Jklamo 13:40, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Support Well-done and detailed. If that is not valuable, I don't know what is. Freedom to share 20:09, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Oppose Map is nice, but I don´t see reason for nomination of its photo into featured pictures. --Karelj 23:19, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Support Rare old map. Sémhur 10:50, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Support
Info The original map consists of 9 parts, it's not one huge map and I think that explains the stitching errors and color differences. It's mentioned on this page (in Swedish). /Daniel78 20:31, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Support These are not stitching errors, imo. I know what one looks like, I have them all the time and those are not stitching errors. Freedom to share 17:27, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Voting time was over -- Benh 21:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)Support Crisp and clear and exceptionally detailed. Provided that it consists of 9 parts, they cannot really be considered stitching errors. — RedCoat 18:55, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
result: 9 supports, 3 opposes, 0 neutral => featured. Benh 21:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)