User talk:Simplicius

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Nacharbeiten: Kategorien usw.

[edit]
File:Mosquito Simplicius.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Achim Raschka (talk) 13:01, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke, Simpl...

[edit]

...für deine Unterstützung nach meiner Sperrung auf de:WP im Sommer letzten Jahres. Ich bin, manche wissen das, mit einem Nachfolgeaccount dort weiterhin, wie ich hoffe, konstruktiv unterwegs und mache diesen Account hier bzw. auf en: dicht, dh. keine Mail, kein Login mehr für mich möglich. Über vergossene Milche soll man nicht weinen. Grüße, --Blogotron (talk) 20:44, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alles Gute, und benimm dich! -- Simplicius (talk) 07:13, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Bahnlinien burgaltendorf 1894.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A.Savin 20:50, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:0405.Annabell 002.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(talk) 02:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Simplicius, wie soll man Argumente gegen den Löschantrag formulieren, wenn das in Rede stehende Ticket hinter den ORTS-Türen verborgen bleibt? Dem ORTS gegenüber kann viel behauptet werden, noch dazu der Vortragende sich hier nicht einmal zu erkennen geben muß, so dass man nicht prüfen kann, welche Interessen er wirklich verfolgt. --Alupus (talk) 21:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Die Wikipedia hat viel mit Wissen zu tun aber wenig mit Logik. Simplicius (talk) 13:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:Ten Year Society userbox.svg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:43, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Danke. Simplicius (talk) 10:09, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Und wie soll dann eine Antwort auf die Behauptung erfolgen dass [diese Bildkandidatur] nicht(!) [gegen meinen Willen] eingestellt wurde?. Der Kommentar von seewolf "Der darf hier nicht mal schreiben. Du darfst natürlich sein Bild vorschlagen, aber ich halte es für ziemlich gemein, das Bild eines Dritten, der sich nicht verteidigen kann, in den Raubtierkäfig zu schmeissen." ist eigentlich nur ... (-; selber ergänzen ;-). Gruß, Heinz-Josef Lücking (talk) 15:46, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Die Lizenzierung durch Martina Nolte ist meines Erachtens nach mangelhaft. Grüße, Simplicius (talk) 17:02, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Knaben-Kapelle Eslarn 1963.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HH58 (talk) 04:08, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please update Iraq civil war map

[edit]

Hello Simplicius. Can you please update the File:Iraq war map.png to show recent Iraqi gains? I asked other users but they didn't update it. Also if you can, please also correct it so ISIS controlled villages near Ramadi and Hīt aren't shown under government control. Newsboy39 (talk) 06:21, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have not idea how to do it. I dont speak Arab and I am not checking the information. It is sad if we were supplied with wrong maps. -- Simplicius (talk) 07:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schwelmer 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:25, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sat1 logo 2016.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sat1 logo 2016.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Jcb (talk) 17:27, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Knappschaftskrankenhaus Langendreer 1909.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Grossberliner Damm 80 (2012).jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Grossberliner Damm 80 (2012).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Grossberliner Damm 80 (2012).jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Smooth O (talk) 17:37, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Breakfast TunisAir.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zenwort (talk) 17:49, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Burg Horkenstein Bochum 1903.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Burg Horkenstein Bochum 1903.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Burg Horkenstein Bochum 1903.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 14:01, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Burg Horkenstein Bochum 1904.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Burg Horkenstein Bochum 1904.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Burg Horkenstein Bochum 1904.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 06:49, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Burg Horkenstein Bochum 1911.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Burg Horkenstein Bochum 1911.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Burg Horkenstein Bochum 1911.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 06:49, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bad habits

[edit]

I just saw your upload about Rupertsberg in 2008 and you should STOP uploading stuff without context and without explaining the history behind it. who made that painting? When? Why does it say what it says in latin? You cannot just upload an historic photo and blatantly ignore its history — Preceding unsigned comment added by AstralChojin (talk • contribs) 10:07, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When I uploaded it, it was dated, and the source was given. It did not do a research on it. -- Simplicius (talk) 09:11, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The picture

[edit]

What's the woman's name that you uploaded by the name cascari , I really need to know 2A01:5EC0:7801:3A1F:A0F5:9B3:67A8:1F0F 13:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Her account was Juliana in German wikipedia but again she changed it. --Simplicius (talk) 09:08, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, willst du deinem Troll-Bild einen Namen geben?

[edit]

Hi Simplicius! Ich mache gerade den Anfang zu einem Wiki Trollzoo, und habe ein Bild was du mal zu Wikipedia getan hast verwendet, ähm, wie soll diese Gattung heißen? Ist doch bei entdeckern in der Tierwelt auch so, dass sie den Tieren Namen geben. Wär lustig wenn du bei dem Spaß mitmachst. Na toll inzwieschen ist der Artikel gelöscht, aber, ist die Idee nicht nachverfolgenswert? Nach Gattung, Alter, Prähistorisch bis Alt, mindestens 10 Jahre alte Trolle, um sie nicht vorzeitig zu Füttern, freier Eintritt... Gruß SalleWinter (talk) 17:48, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Geheimer Troll ohne Name. -- Simplicius (talk) 10:10, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:A German prostitute's self-portrait in a brothel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chaptagai (talk) 14:08, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]